Page facilities

• View/Add comments about this article/subject in the forum: [click here]
• Link to this page: right click here, choose 'Copy Shortcut'
• Skip to places in this page: [None]
• View photographs related to this page: [None]

The author of these articles wishes to remain anonymous. For this reason they cannot be credited, however THIS ARTICLE MUST NOT BE REPRODUCED ANYWHERE ELSE

First of all I have sat on some of this information for years. I started taking an interest in UFO’s after I read the first public account of Rendlesham in the papers. It was only recently that I started to research this incident by joining the Rendlesham forest incident forum. Although a UFO believer, I had to look at possible man made scenarios if only to eliminate them. It was this area of research that I started to see some vague connection to the information you will read below.

I decided to post this theory on the web site even though I would possibly get accused of being a de bunker not to mention the fact that all these UFO websites especially the forums are scanned occasionally by our security services. Not that I have anything to hide or feel guilty about.

My contacts have told me that Britain is and has been working on anti gravity research since the mid 50’s. Only the media uses the words anti gravity, it is usually referred to in scientific circles by another name but I cannot remember what.

What you are about to read may sound fanciful and hard to believe but my contact at DERA (I met while working in my civil service job) said that we are far in advance on this section of science and may explain some of the flying triangles that have been seen. He was scathing about saucer shaped UFO’s though.

This science was initially based round the degaussing system used to de magnetise the heads of a tape recorders. Looking at the science of magnetism and gravity led to the incorporation of nuclear particle science and research, which by the way we Brits are quite good at. The Nazi’s were working on this during the war. After the war the Americans and Russians got the rocket scientists and apparently we got a few of the physicists and electronic scientists.

I’m told that an ‘Ion’ engine was developed by a British ‘scientist’ in conjunction with Rolls Royce. Rolls continued development along with scientists from other undisclosed scientific establishments. (This was public knowledge until a ‘D’ notice was slapped on it, not sure when but many years ago). The ion engine was initially intended to power space craft between planets where there was no gravitational pull or atmosphere. It still didn’t get round the problem of getting out of our earths gravitational pull so research was carried out into eliminating this problem. Rumour has it that they had cracked it and some of this research was shared with the Americans for undisclosed reasons. The ion engine is a self perpetuating engine which will run for years but I haven’t a clue how it works except it uses ions that are all around us including space. Where this science is today and its progress I have no idea. We can only guess.

The only thing to have come out of this research (as far as I know) commercially is the Neodymium magnet. It’s attraction or repelling powers far our weigh its weight. Compared to the more common magnets. It weighs nothing yet is very powerful.

My contacts who are not UFO believers in the true sense of the word said that the Rendlesham forest incident could have been an early experimental UAV powered by this system. It was probably a beam riding device where its flight envelope was controlled by a radio beam as the microprocessor/computer was not sufficiently small or sophisticated enough in those days. There had been a malfunction. This caused the area to become very electro static (heavily ionised) and a bi product of this was plasma balls that were positively charged with ions. Remember, I’m still guessing.

This made them accelerate away from the craft into the air giving off bright light.

The dripping liquid metal that Halt describes coming from the craft whilst ascending could have been a liquid gas discharge from the craft.

The lights on the craft were there just so it could be seen by the operators at night when it was tested. They were also possibly, warning lights to keep away.

(Was it a plasma ball that the 2 ex RAF pilots saw at RAE Farnborough due to early experiments many years ago)? Shown on a TV Doc Riddle of the skies.

My own theory is that Orfordness was its test site and all tests I suspect were kept within the Orfordness air space, but this particular test was for want of a better description a fly away. It was deliberately crash landed in the woods so it didn’t jeopardise the air base or the weapons on the base.

I’ve always had a suspicion that the BT research centre at Martlesham Heath had a part to play in this as well.

(Remember, they were allegedly connected to the Cobra Mist radar project on Orfordness which was de commissioned before 1980 but the connection remained perhaps for other uses). Its also worth remembering that Orfordness was used as part of Britain’s atomic bomb research so many experiments may have taken place there ancillary to A bomb centrifuge testing. I also think that RAF Bawdsey (experimental RADAR base) which is quite near has a finger in this as well?

Perhaps this is why the local prison was put on evac standby? Were they put on evac standby before these events or during and after? There’s a clue in the timing.

The craft needed to rest while they deactivated the power unit to cool it down (Penniston said the craft was warm to the touch yet it was a cold winters night)! before attempting to fly it back to base wherever that was [Orfordness]? There were 3 attempts over the 3 nights and it was 3rd time lucky.

I also asked if there would be any Alpha, Beta or Gamma radiation that could be leaked into the surrounding area (my ROC fallout training). The answer was surprising, “It may have had a radio active isotope that had a defective shield from the crash but I guess not enough to harm you”. My contact said it was his theory.

I was reminded here to stop asking questions as a ‘D’ notice not only prevents publication but denies you the right to ask questions. My contact then said, “I’m just as in the dark as you are”.

So some of the witness statements do add up, electro static atmosphere, balls of light, warm to the touch, radiation readings, dripping molten metal and a controlled crash landing in the woods. Was there a cover up? Maybe, perhaps to cover up our technology?

The only thing I cannot fathom out is the 5 balls of light that split from the craft and then shone light beams down to the ground. I just can’t explain the reasons or science behind that. I also cannot explain the orange balls of light that arrived first.

Allegedly some of this technology has been shared with the Americans where some was used on the B2 Spirit stealth bomber (hence its cost) and other still undisclosed black projects. Black flying triangles using this technology perhaps, you never know?

As for some claims that aliens were seen at the Rendlesham incident, I just don’t know whether to believe this or not. Some said there were and others said there were not!

One friend said to me that they may not have been aliens but humans just wearing protective suits and helmets, and this sight in a woods at night just ‘spooked’ the airmen.

If it’s true (I find this hard to believe) that an attending officer spoke and shook hands with these ‘beings’ I guess it was in English, if that’s the case, then it suggests that they were English speaking beings/humans which in turn suggests either British or Americans or both? However, they could have been considering their size and apparent semi transparent nature holographs rather than living beings.

I think the yellow mist surrounding the craft was highly ionised gas and this would have been a good medium for a 3D holographic projection.

I’ve heard about holographic projection onto/into ionised gas/plasma in a lab and it is possible, but I very much doubt we had that capability in 1980. Just for one moment we suppose it was a holographic projection of ‘little’ beings, the question is why?

Unless of course, and here’s the twist, it was an extra terrestrial robotic craft along with its ‘photographic’ occupants, if so my theory is down the pan. Just how you talk to a hologram I do not know.

If this technology exists, is it wholly man made or was/is a joint project between man and some other intelligence?

Or was it from information received?

We are led to believe by one witness that a ‘spare part’ was flown in to RAF Woodbridge from Germany to enable a repair to take place on the ‘UFO’. If this was the case, it implies the craft was man made. We don’t hear any more about this such as who handed it over or who fitted it or what the spare part was?

If these craft exist would the current models be fitted with the latest On board computers including SAT NAV, probably?

Are they responsible for the crop circles which could have been flight envelope testing to see how accurate and detailed they could plan the flight using Sat Nav, and they thought they would have a bit of fun doing it.

Finally, British/US politics and commercial decisions and manoeuvrings, if you really delve deeply you may find some clues to all this, I have one or two theories and observations but no room here for them.

I have to say that no body I talked to in my opinion gave me any state secrets or had breeched the official secrets act. It was me putting 2 and 2 together and making 5 but with the odd wink and nudge from friends and contacts I feel there is some 4 there as well in this summery.

Find this far fetched, or could it be that we are getting warmer in this investigation?

Return to top of page.